Subscribe by Email

Your email:

The "RISKY BUSINESS" Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

"So Devin ... is OSSIM Awesome?"

Posted by John Verry on Thu, Mar 25, 2010 @ 08:39 AM
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon |  Share On Technorati Technorati | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Ever have one of those really intriguing moments ... where for the rest of the day your mind keeps circling back and considering the possibilities? I had one yesterday.

A client asked us to help them on a SIEM Proof of Concept leveraging OSSIM (Open Source Security Information Manager). We had tried OSSIM a few years ago with minimal success, but had been intrigued by Alien Vault's stewardship of the project, so we were excited to participate. We figured the best way to get started was to deploy OSSIM in our environment.

Just a few hours later our SIEM Practice Manager grabbed me by the arm with a big smile, "you gotta see this!"

Remarkably, our network had been auto-discovered, a Vulnerability Assessment had been run, net-flows were being captured, we had real-time visibility to network traffic, a snort ids sensor with an appropriate signature set had been deployed, and basic network monitoring functionality was in place.

Now if OSSIM doesn't sound like a conventional SIEM, it isn't. OSSIM integrates a diverse array of existing Open Source security tools into a unified whole which is notably more valuable than the sum of its parts. Surfing our security related data gave me greater insight into our operations and our information security posture. Very quickly we had a comprehensive view of our environment, with one notable exception, we were not yet monitoring device logs (which is really the lynch-pin of SIEM).

It took another 10 minutes or so and OSSIM was receiving logs from one of our more chatty Cent-OS boxes. After updating Snare on our 2008 Active Directory box OSSIM happily consumed our AD logs, although, the regex's will need a bit of fine-tuning to handle a few of the event types we want to capture.

So would Devin Woodcomb proclaim that OSSIM is "awesome"? Not sure yet, but I am intrigued as hell at its ability to provide significant value right out of the box. BTW, I wonder if mentioning that everything we have tested to this point is part of the open source version (free!) would tip his opinion ...

 

  

 

1 Comments Click here to read/write comments

SIEM Implementation: 2 Simple Cost Savings Strategies

Posted by John Verry on Fri, May 29, 2009 @ 04:18 PM
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon |  Share On Technorati Technorati | Submit to Reddit reddit 
I'm a big fan of all things SIEM - except the cost.  The cost for a full blown SIEM implementation in a F100 company  with multiple compliance requirements can easily reach mid six figures if you're not careful.  A lot of the cost often relates to data storage and licensing - two cost centers that can potentially be reduced significantly without impacting functionality all that much.
  • STORAGE: SIEM's require a lot of storage when you are reaching 500,000,000 events/day.  The raw data, indexes to speed searching, summary data to facilitate reporting and related meta data can easily drive a requirement for 50 Terra Bytes of storage or more if you need to keep the data around for a year to meet compliance standards (e.g. PCI Data Security Standard).  You also need fast, easily manageable storage, which often means SAN - which definitely means expensive.
  • LICENSES: SIEM's also require a number of servers running potentially expensive OS's, databases, and BI/Reporting Tools.   

During a recent engagement the cost to implement the SIEM per the original design got a bit too pricey so we looked for ways to reduce the cost.

  1. We limited the online (SAN based) storage from one year to 90 days.  The other 275 days of data will sit on a highly compressed text indexed server that will provide them the ability to run searches on older data the handful of times that it may be necessary.
  2. We moved from a Solaris to Linux (which also allowed us to move from Sun to x86 servers).
  3. We moved from Oracle to MySQL (with 4  CPU's the cost and maintenance savings were notable).
  4. We moved from Crystal Reports to Jasper Reports.

The net was the cost was reduced by several hundred thousand dollars with minimal impact to functionality .... Not too bad for an afternoon's work !

Visit our SIEM page to download additional resources!


SIEM tools, video and more on our SIEM resource page.

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Choosing the Right SIEM Model to Achieve Best Practice #4

Posted by John Verry on Tue, May 05, 2009 @ 11:16 AM
  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon |  Share On Technorati Technorati | Submit to Reddit reddit 
If you have read our white paper "Five Best Practices for Security Information Event Management (SIEM)" you are already familiar with SIEM Best Practice # 4 "Commit the Resources Required on a Go-Forward Basis".  Failure to adequately resource a SIEM post initial deployment is one of the greatest risks to successful SIEM deployments.  Resourcing is closely coupled to the SIEM model that you choose:
  •  In-Sourced (Buy & Operate) - this model is best where SIEM is mission critical, there is a larger security team, 24/7 operations, and a higher risk profile (e.g., US Navy). The Good: full control, intellectual capital development, wow/buzz for team. The Bad: Sourcing/managing multiple talented (expensive) resources.
  • Out-Sourced (Buy (or Monthly) & Delegate) - this model is best where compliance is focus (e.g., perimeter security for Regional Bank). The Good: Reduced capital costs, buy SME at a bargain price, lowest total cost. The Bad: Pure outsourcing results in a lack of event contextualization/understanding, risk (monitor the monitor).
  • Co-Sourced (Buy (or Monthly) & Joint Operation) - this model is best where requirements are complex (e.g., Enterprise wide compliance with multiple regulations). The Good: Reduced capital costs, buy SME at a bargain price. The Bad: Internal stakeholders are needed to provide event contextualization/understanding.
No matter the model -- the key is ensuring that you have appropriately qualified folks with sufficient time on their hands to optimize the return on your SIEM investment.
 



Don’t miss our white paper – available for download – to optimize SIEM deployment.

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

All Posts